SoftBank: pay cuts do not offset investment flops - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

SoftBank: pay cuts do not offset investment flops

Founder Masayoshi Son has promised to play defence, slowing the pace of new investments and preserving cash

Founder Masayoshi Son is trying to turn round the fortunes of SoftBank following a historic loss for its Vision Fund unit. But moves to counteract falling profits and a dwindling share price are too little, too late. They include steep pay cuts for executives of the Japanese tech investment group.

The surprisingly steep reductions follow a record investment loss of ¥3.5tn ($27.5bn) at the Vision Fund unit for the year to March. Oddly, Son’s pay was unchanged at Y100mn ($785,000). Executives who suffered pay package shrinkage included chief financial officer Yoshimitsu Goto. His remuneration dropped 40 per cent compared with the previous year

SoftBank has a history of largesse. Simon Segars, the former chief executive of the company’s chip unit Arm, earned $9mn during the three months that he was a board director. Former chief operating officer Marcelo Claure, who left SoftBank earlier this year after months of frosty negotiations over pay, earned more than $14mn in the year before his departure. That put him on a par with former chief operating officer of Bank of America Thomas Montag.

SoftBank blamed the record loss at its first Vision Fund in the year to March on the tech sell-off in the US and China. But some prominent companies in which SoftBank is the largest shareholder have performed far worse than the market. Shares in South Korean ecommerce platform Coupang have plunged 72 per cent since it listed. The stock of Didi, a Chinese ride-hailing group, has fallen 75 per cent in the past year.

Such reversals call into question the strategy of SoftBank executives including Rajeev Misra, chief executive of SoftBank Investment Advisers, which oversees the firm’s Vision Funds.

SoftBank shares have halved since their 2021 peak. They trade below book value at less than half the group’s stated net asset value of $150bn.

Son has promised to play defence, slowing the pace of new investments and preserving cash. The question for investors should be whether it is worth holding shares in a business that is still paying executives highly to underperform the market.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

为什么美国对中国征收关税是一个错误的举措?

拜登对北京征收的新税破坏了全球经济和气候转型。

AI驱动的个人助理正在成为现实

谷歌和OpenAI发布了新工具,使“智能系统”更近一步。这将成为生成式人工智能的里程碑吗?

我们可以向新加坡学到什么,不能学到什么?

这个岛屿城邦的终极优势在于没有教条主义。

寿命延长将带来深刻的社会变革

人们必须延长工作时间,养老金制度也需要改革。

为什么我相信OpenAI和技术乐观主义会成功?

人们对科技的信任可能有所下降,但对其服务和股票的需求却处于历史最高水平。

为什么英伟达可能成为美国最有价值的股票?

达到3万亿美元的里程碑式估值并非易事,但这家芯片制造商已做好迎接挑战的准备。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×